Noise-boosted recurrent backpropagation
A statistical formulation of recurrent backpropagation (RBP) allows direct noise boosting for time-varying classification and regression. The noise boost reduces training iterations and improves accuracy. The injected noise is just that noise that makes the current signal more probable. This noise-b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurocomputing (Amsterdam) 2023-11, Vol.559, p.126438, Article 126438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A statistical formulation of recurrent backpropagation (RBP) allows direct noise boosting for time-varying classification and regression. The noise boost reduces training iterations and improves accuracy. The injected noise is just that noise that makes the current signal more probable. This noise-boost result extends the two recent results that backpropagation is a special case of the generalized expectation maximization (EM) algorithm and that careful noise injection can always speed the average convergence of the EM algorithm to a local maximum of the log-likelihood surface. The noise-benefit conditions differ for additive and multiplicative noise in RBP. We tested noise-boosted RBP classifiers on 11 classes of sports video clips and tested RBP regressors on predicting the dollar-rupee exchange rate. Injecting noisy-EM (NEM) noise outperformed injecting blind noise or injecting no noise at all. Additive NEM noise usually outperformed multiplicative noise. The best case of NEM noise injection with RBP training of a recurrent neural classification model speeded up its training by 60% and improved its classification accuracy by 9.51% compared with noiseless RBP training and accuracy. The best performance of the NEM noise with the RBP training of a recurrent neural regression model yielded a 38% speed-up in training and also reduced the squared error by 49.3%. The injection of the additive NEM noise in the output and hidden neurons performed best. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0925-2312 1872-8286 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126438 |