Noise-boosted recurrent backpropagation

A statistical formulation of recurrent backpropagation (RBP) allows direct noise boosting for time-varying classification and regression. The noise boost reduces training iterations and improves accuracy. The injected noise is just that noise that makes the current signal more probable. This noise-b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurocomputing (Amsterdam) 2023-11, Vol.559, p.126438, Article 126438
Hauptverfasser: Adigun, Olaoluwa, Kosko, Bart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A statistical formulation of recurrent backpropagation (RBP) allows direct noise boosting for time-varying classification and regression. The noise boost reduces training iterations and improves accuracy. The injected noise is just that noise that makes the current signal more probable. This noise-boost result extends the two recent results that backpropagation is a special case of the generalized expectation maximization (EM) algorithm and that careful noise injection can always speed the average convergence of the EM algorithm to a local maximum of the log-likelihood surface. The noise-benefit conditions differ for additive and multiplicative noise in RBP. We tested noise-boosted RBP classifiers on 11 classes of sports video clips and tested RBP regressors on predicting the dollar-rupee exchange rate. Injecting noisy-EM (NEM) noise outperformed injecting blind noise or injecting no noise at all. Additive NEM noise usually outperformed multiplicative noise. The best case of NEM noise injection with RBP training of a recurrent neural classification model speeded up its training by 60% and improved its classification accuracy by 9.51% compared with noiseless RBP training and accuracy. The best performance of the NEM noise with the RBP training of a recurrent neural regression model yielded a 38% speed-up in training and also reduced the squared error by 49.3%. The injection of the additive NEM noise in the output and hidden neurons performed best.
ISSN:0925-2312
1872-8286
DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126438