Screening of some banned aromatic amines in textile products from Indian bandhani and gamthi fabric and in human sweat using micellar liquid chromatography

•The use of dyes based on toxic aromatic amines in textile is strictly controlled.•Studied aromatic amines were 4-aminophenol, p-phenylenediamine and benzidine.•They have been determined in textile products and sweat by micellar liquid chromatography.•Method was eco-friendly, economic, easy-to-condu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microchemical journal 2021-06, Vol.165, p.106134, Article 106134
Hauptverfasser: Pahade, Priyanka, Bose, Devasish, Peris-Vicente, Juan, Goberna-Bravo, María Ángeles, Albiol Chiva, Jaume, Esteve Romero, Josep, Carda-Broch, Samuel, Durgbanshi, Abhilasha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The use of dyes based on toxic aromatic amines in textile is strictly controlled.•Studied aromatic amines were 4-aminophenol, p-phenylenediamine and benzidine.•They have been determined in textile products and sweat by micellar liquid chromatography.•Method was eco-friendly, economic, easy-to-conduct and practical. Certain dyes in textile products, which are capable of reductively splitting into carcinogenic aromatic amines, are strictly controlled in many countries. A simple, rapid, sensitive and green chromatographic method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of 4-aminophenol (4-AMP), p-phenylenediamine (p-PPD) and benzidine (BNZ), banned aromatic amines in dyeing clothes and human sweat. The separation was achieved using a micellar mobile phase of 0.1 M SDS, 4% 1- butanol (v/v) buffered to pH 7 with sodium dihydrogen phosphate, flowing under isocratic mode at 1 mL/min through a C18 column. Photodiode array detector was set at 210 nm. Using the above chromatographic conditions, 4-AMP, p-PPD and BNZ were eluted at 3.5 min, 4.7 min. and 5.4 min., respectively, adequately resolved. The method was validated by Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology guideline for the industry in terms of selectivity, calibration curve, linearity (r2 = 0.999), trueness (relative bias, −3.5 to 7%) precision (relative standard deviation,
ISSN:0026-265X
1095-9149
DOI:10.1016/j.microc.2021.106134