On the UPMSat-2 magnetometer’s calibration methods performance comparison for poorly conditioned datasets

•Methodology robust to ill-conditioned data sets for magnetometers calibration.•Testing of fitting methods for an ellipsoid defined by a noisy data set.•Testing of fitting methods for non-homogeneous and sparse ellipsoidal data sets. This article summarises the work related to the calibration method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2023-02, Vol.207, p.112381, Article 112381
Hauptverfasser: Rodríguez-Rojo, Elena, Cubas, Javier, Pindado, Santiago
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Methodology robust to ill-conditioned data sets for magnetometers calibration.•Testing of fitting methods for an ellipsoid defined by a noisy data set.•Testing of fitting methods for non-homogeneous and sparse ellipsoidal data sets. This article summarises the work related to the calibration methodology of the Attitude, Control and Determination Subsystem (ADCS) sensors used in the UPMSat-2 mission project, a 50 kg satellite designed and manufactured by the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. The ADCS sensors are two fluxgate magnetometers whose calibration is essential to obtain correct measurements. Since the calibration process must be performed once the magnetometers are integrated in the satellite, the range of movements to obtain a representative set of measurements distributed in space is limited. n the present work, several geometric adjustment algorithms are evaluated in order to find the best mathematical structure for this particular problem: underconditioned measurements in the calibration scenarios. The magnetometer data obtained in the satellite integration test are used, together with the selected fitting algorithm, to obtain the calibration parameters of the sensors.
ISSN:0263-2241
1873-412X
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112381