A comprehensive comparison of accuracy and practicality of different types of algorithms for pre-impact fall detection using both young and old adults

•Pre-impact fall detection is critical for fall injury prevention of old people.•A comprehensive comparison of three pre-impact fall detection algorithms was conducted.•Large-scale motion datasets from both young and old adults were used.•Deep learning algorithm showed superior accuracy and high pra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2022-09, Vol.201, p.111785, Article 111785
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Xiaoqun, Koo, Bummo, Jang, Jaehyuk, Kim, Youngho, Xiong, Shuping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Pre-impact fall detection is critical for fall injury prevention of old people.•A comprehensive comparison of three pre-impact fall detection algorithms was conducted.•Large-scale motion datasets from both young and old adults were used.•Deep learning algorithm showed superior accuracy and high practicality.•Deep learning algorithm had robust performance on external validation of old adults. This study aims to comprehensively compare the accuracy and practicality of three different types of algorithms for pre-impact fall detection using both young and old subjects. Threshold-based, conventional machine learning (SVM) and deep learning (ConvLSTM) algorithms were compared. Results showed that ConvLSTM had an accuracy of 99.16 % (sensitivity: 99.32 %, specificity: 99.01 %) and an averaged lead time of 403 ms on young subjects, which outperformed SVM (97.16 %, 385 ms) and much superior to the threshold-based algorithm (89.06 %, 333 ms). In addition, latency tests on an embedded device showed that the Lite model of ConvLSTM had a low latency of 2.1 ms, which was comparable to the threshold-based algorithm (
ISSN:0263-2241
1873-412X
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111785