Registration between DCT and EBSD datasets for multiphase microstructures
The ability to characterise the three-dimensional microstructure of multiphase materials is essential for understanding the interaction between phases and their associated materials properties. Here, laboratory-based diffraction-contrast tomography (lab-based DCT), a recently-established materials c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials characterization 2023-10, Vol.204, p.113228, Article 113228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The ability to characterise the three-dimensional microstructure of multiphase materials is essential for understanding the interaction between phases and their associated materials properties. Here, laboratory-based diffraction-contrast tomography (lab-based DCT), a recently-established materials characterization technique that can determine grain phases, morphologies, positions and orientations in a voxel-based reconstruction method, was used to map part of a dual-phase steel alloy sample. To assess the resulting microstructures produced by the lab-based DCT technique, an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) map was collected within the same sample volume. To identify the two-dimensional (2D) slice of the three-dimensional (3D) lab-based DCT reconstruction that best corresponded to the 2D EBSD map, a novel registration technique based solely on grain-averaged orientations was developed – this registration technique requires very little a priori knowledge of dataset alignment and can be extended to other techniques that only recover grain-averaged orientation data such as far-field 3D X-ray diffraction microscopy. Once the corresponding 2D slice was identified in the lab-based DCT dataset, comparisons of phase balance, grain size, shape and texture were performed between lab-based DCT and EBSD techniques. More complicated aspects of the microstructural morphology such as grain boundary shape and grains less than a critical size were poorly reproduced by the lab-based DCT reconstruction, primarily due to the difference in resolutions of the technique compared with EBSD. However, lab-based DCT is shown to accurately determine the centre-of-mass position, orientation, and size of the large grains for each phase present, austenite and martensitic ferrite. The results reveals a complex ferrite grain network of similar crystal orientations that are absent from the EBSD dataset. Such detail demonstrates that lab-based DCT, as a technique, shows great promise in the field of multi-phase material characterization.
[Display omitted]
•A simultaneous lab-based DCT reconstruction, applied to a dual-phase alloy, is shown.•A metastable austenitic stainless steel is studied with lab-based DCT and EBSD.•A new registration method identifies common grains between DCT and EBSD datasets.•Complex microstructures can skew lab-based DCT measurements of grain size and shape.•Lab-based DCT can describe 3D texture and macrozones missed by 2D-EBSD. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1044-5803 1873-4189 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.113228 |