Seafarers vs. Port State Control: Decoding Work/rest Compliance Data Disparity
Mandatory work/rest hours regulations guarantee a base level of fatigue management at sea while ensuring an even playing field across the industry. Although studies have highlighted concerns regarding the accuracy of compliance reporting and enforcement efficacy in detecting non-compliance, a gap re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine policy 2024-05, Vol.163, p.106105, Article 106105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mandatory work/rest hours regulations guarantee a base level of fatigue management at sea while ensuring an even playing field across the industry. Although studies have highlighted concerns regarding the accuracy of compliance reporting and enforcement efficacy in detecting non-compliance, a gap remains in understanding the extent of work/rest non-compliance that may go undetected during enforcement efforts.
This study compared the results of port State control (PSC) inspections conducted as part of concentrated inspection campaigns focusing on hours of work/rest regulations with the outcomes of a global seafarers’ survey.
The study revealed that while compliance rates with the PSC ranged from 90.0% to 99.3%, the survey results identified seafarers reporting notably lower compliance rates with hours of work/rest regulations, ranging from 11.7% to 16.1%.
Factors such as adjusting work/rest hours records, seafarers’ hesitancy to disclose non-compliance, contrasting record-keeping objectives, inadequacies in current recording systems and challenges in enforcement would explain this weighty discrepancy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0308-597X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106105 |