Effect of different inactivation condition on Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus plantarum: Culturability, cell integrity and morphology

This study evaluated the effect of two inactivation methods on probiotic, and aimed to determine a suitable inactivation method and condition for obtaining beneficial paraprobiotics from Lactobacillus plantarum (LP) and Lactobacillus gasseri (LG). The effect of inactivation condition on culturabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food science & technology 2024-04, Vol.197, p.115915, Article 115915
Hauptverfasser: Gholian, Mohammad Mahdi, Babaei, Arash, Zendeboodi, Fatemeh, Mortazavian, Amir M., Koushki, Vahid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study evaluated the effect of two inactivation methods on probiotic, and aimed to determine a suitable inactivation method and condition for obtaining beneficial paraprobiotics from Lactobacillus plantarum (LP) and Lactobacillus gasseri (LG). The effect of inactivation condition on culturability, physiological properties, and morphological characteristics was evaluated by a plating method, flow cytometry, and field emission-scanning electron microscopy, respectively. The result revealed that each strain conferred different resistance to inactivation methods. The heat-treated (75 and 90 °C for 15 and 30 min) LG lost its growth ability, but it's all sonicated samples (50 and 100 W for 5 and 10 min) were stable and maintained their growth ability. However, the ability to grow on culture media of sonicated (50 and 100 W for 5 and 10 min) LP was less than its heat-treated (75 and 90 °C for 15 min) specimens. According to flow cytometry data, the membrane integrity of each probiotic cell was affected by both inactivation methods; however, the severe heat process (90 for 30 min) causes the most serious membrane damage to LG cells (PI = 97.7%). Morphological properties of both strains were significantly affected by inactivation methods. After inactivation treatment, damaged cell, cell roughness, lysed cell, cell adhesions, cell disruption, and cell bending were increased, significantly. Results indicate that for obtaining a functional paraprobiotic the inactivation process should be optimized. Also, it should be noticed that a particular optimized inactivation method is not suitable for obtaining paraprobiotic from all probiotic strains. •Sonication and thermal process impose different effects on viable cells.•The flow cytometry method is a promising method for observing the viability of cells.•Selection of a proper inactivation method is very important for obtaining a health-benefit paraprobiotic.
ISSN:0023-6438
1096-1127
DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115915