Social drivers of vulnerability to wildfire disasters: A review of the literature

•Wildfire risk assessments have increased significantly but remain largely focused on wildfire exposure.•Social vulnerability indices overlook the intersecting and contextual ways that vulnerability to wildfire emerges in different populations.•Current paradigms for reducing wildfire vulnerability d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2023-09, Vol.237, p.104797, Article 104797
Hauptverfasser: Lambrou, Nicole, Kolden, Crystal, Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia, Anjum, Erica, Acey, Charisma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Wildfire risk assessments have increased significantly but remain largely focused on wildfire exposure.•Social vulnerability indices overlook the intersecting and contextual ways that vulnerability to wildfire emerges in different populations.•Current paradigms for reducing wildfire vulnerability do not acknowledge or address inequalities that create differential vulnerability.•Centering adaptation equity, rather than landscape outcomes, can mitigate differential exposure to wildfire risk. The increase of wildfire disasters globally has highlighted the need to understand and mitigate human vulnerability to wildfire. In response, there has been a substantial uptick in efforts to characterize and quantify wildfire vulnerability. Such efforts have largely focused on quantifying potential wildfire exposure and frequently overlooked the individual and community vulnerability to wildfire. Here, we review the emergent literature on social vulnerability to wildfire by synthesizing factors related to exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity that contribute to a population’s or community’s overall vulnerability to wildfires. We identify how those factors subsequently affect an individual’s or community’s agency to enact change, and highlight that many of the current paradigms for reducing wildfire vulnerability fail to acknowledge and address the importance of inequalities that create differential vulnerability. We suggest that paying attention to the systems and conditions that give rise to such vulnerability can ameliorate these shortcomings by centering solutions which address adaptation equity rather than landscape outcomes.
ISSN:0169-2046
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104797