Global trends and local variations in land take per person

•We attribute new built-up land to changes in density and changes in population for 75,102 regions worldwide.•Between 37.5% and 49.6% of all built-up land expansion is related to density decrease.•We find most densification in large cities and in the Global South.•Densification of large cities leads...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2022-02, Vol.218, p.104308, Article 104308
Hauptverfasser: Li, Mengmeng, Verburg, Peter H., van Vliet, Jasper
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We attribute new built-up land to changes in density and changes in population for 75,102 regions worldwide.•Between 37.5% and 49.6% of all built-up land expansion is related to density decrease.•We find most densification in large cities and in the Global South.•Densification of large cities leads to a polarization effect, with increasingly sparser rural areas.•We argue for a critical scrutiny of urban densification policies beyond land take only. Globally, urban areas are growing at a faster rate than their population, potentially reducing environmental sustainability due to undesirable land take in (semi)natural and agricultural lands. However, it is unclear to what extent this trend varies locally, which may hamper the formulation and implementation of local-scale policies in the context of the global competition for land. Here, we attribute built-up land change to population dynamics and changes in land take per person, for >75,000 administrative regions worldwide, typically representing municipalities or counties. Results show that changes in land take per person, expressed as the area of built-up land per capita, relate to 38.3%, 49.6%, and 37.5% of the total increase in built-up land during the periods 1975–1990, 1990–2000, and 2000–2015, respectively, but with large local variations. Interestingly, we find that centres of large cities densify in all three periods, while their rural areas show an opposite development, suggesting an urban polarization effect. We also find densification in many regions in the Global South that already have a high population density, leading to potential trade-offs in terms of human wellbeing. Therefore, our work provides novel insights into the debate on sustainable urban development at a global scale.
ISSN:0169-2046
1872-6062
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104308