Is frequent sighing an indicator of dispositional negative emotionality? A multi-sample, multi-measure naturalistic-observation study

•In previous research, sighing in daily life was related to subclinical depression.•Lay people believe sighing is related to trait negative emotionality.•We used recordings made throughout the daily lives of many people to code frequency of sighing.•Contradicting assumptions, sighing was unrelated t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in personality 2021-02, Vol.90, p.104046, Article 104046
Hauptverfasser: Danvers, Alexander F., Milek, Anne, Tackman, Allison M., Kaplan, Deanna M., Robbins, Megan L., Poslinelli, Angelina, Moseley, Suzanne, Raison, Charles L., Sbarra, David, Mehl, Matthias R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•In previous research, sighing in daily life was related to subclinical depression.•Lay people believe sighing is related to trait negative emotionality.•We used recordings made throughout the daily lives of many people to code frequency of sighing.•Contradicting assumptions, sighing was unrelated to negative emotionality.•Sighing may have a more complex relationship to emotional experience. Sighing is a common nonverbal everyday behavior thought to signal the experiencing of negative emotions. Prior research from a small-scale study suggests that observed daily expressions of sighing is associated with subclinical depression (Robbins, Mehl, Holleran, & Kasle, 2011). This paper replicates and extends these findings, hypothesizing that individual differences in negative emotionality are associated with frequency of spontaneous sighing. Study 1 (N = 320) documents a strong lay assumption that frequent sighing signals dispositional negative emotionality. Study 2 estimates the actual association between daily sighing, assessed naturalistically using the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), and negative emotionality in a large, diverse, pooled sample (N = 469). Bayesian tests across six measures (neuroticism, depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, loneliness) strongly support the null model. Together, results suggest the common intuition that people who sigh frequently experience more negative emotionality is inaccurate. Assessing whether an individual sighs more (or less) than others cannot be used to infer that they experience more negative emotions.
ISSN:0092-6566
1095-7251
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104046