Development of impact resistant high-strength strain-hardening cementitious composites (HS-SHCC) superior to reactive powder concrete (RPC) under flexure

The drop-weight impact behavior of the ductility enhanced high-strength strain-hardening cementitious composites (dHS-SHCC) is compared to that of conventional reactive powder concrete (RPC) to validate its super-impact resistance. All materials have an identical fiber volume fraction of 2%. The com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Building Engineering 2021-12, Vol.44, p.102652, Article 102652
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Min-Jae, Choi, Hong-Joon, Shin, Wonsik, Oh, Taekgeun, Yoo, Doo-Yeol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The drop-weight impact behavior of the ductility enhanced high-strength strain-hardening cementitious composites (dHS-SHCC) is compared to that of conventional reactive powder concrete (RPC) to validate its super-impact resistance. All materials have an identical fiber volume fraction of 2%. The compressive strengths of RPC and dHS-SHCC are approximately 210 and 115 MPa, respectively. RPC has the highest ultimate tensile strength of 17.9 MPa, while the developed dHS-SHCC has the highest tensile strain capacity and energy absorption capacity up to the peak (g-value) of 5.9% and 526.0 kJ/m3, respectively. It also absorbs 3.2 times higher energy up to the peak under flexure (toughness) as compared to that of RPC. The RPC beams completely fail upon impact of a drop hammer with a potential energy of 490 J. However, the dHS-SHCC beams are only partially damaged along with multiple microcrack formations and rebounds. Moreover, it produces at least four times the microcracks and is more sensitive to the strain-rate than those of RPC. Consequently, it can be determined that using developed dHS-SHCC is effective in resisting impact loads as compared to RPC. •The highest tensile strength of 17.9 MPa is achieved in RPC.•The highest strain capacity and g-value of 5.9% and 526.0 kJ/m3 are obtained in UHP-SHCC.•UHP-SHCC can absorb 3.2 times higher energy under flexure than that of RPC.•Given a potential energy of 490 J, only the UHP-SHCC beam withstands the impact load.•UHP-SHCC is more effective in resisting impact loads than RPC and HS-SHCC.
ISSN:2352-7102
2352-7102
DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102652