Overwinter behavior, movement, and survival in a recently reintroduced, endangered amphibian, Rana muscosa

Basic natural history information is critical for species conservation but is often deficient for endangered species, which can be rare and difficult to study. This is particularly true for behavior and natural history during the winter in temperate regions, when site access can be challenging. For...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for nature conservation 2021-12, Vol.64, p.126086, Article 126086
Hauptverfasser: Hammond, Talisin T., Curtis, Michelle J., Jacobs, Leah E., Gaffney, Patricia M., Clancy, Meredith M., Swaisgood, Ronald R., Shier, Debra M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Basic natural history information is critical for species conservation but is often deficient for endangered species, which can be rare and difficult to study. This is particularly true for behavior and natural history during the winter in temperate regions, when site access can be challenging. For translocation programs in temperate regions, however, winter may be a critical time to assess movement, survival, and threats to persistence in order to understand the causes of translocation failures. Using radiotelemetry, we monitored movement from fall through spring in reintroduced, ex situ bred individuals (N = 21) of the endangered mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) to characterize behavior during brumation (overwinter dormancy), overwinter infection prevalence of the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), and survival. We found that movement rates were variable but low in comparison to other sites. Frogs moved more in the fall when temperatures were warmer in comparison to the winter and spring. However, some frogs still moved (very small distances) even when water temperatures were below 2 °C and snow covered the ground. Frogs were difficult to detect visually, but were almost always in water, including during brumation, when they usually appeared to be in underwater rock caves and crevices in pool habitat. Frogs appeared to be spatially clustered in 3–5 groups throughout the study period and those within a group were often located
ISSN:1617-1381
1618-1093
DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126086