Secondary teachers’ meanings for function notation in the United States and South Korea
•Analysis of U.S. and Korean teachers’ written responses to function notation items.•U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules.•U.S. teachers’ meanings are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers. This study investigates what teachers in U.S. reveal about their meanings for function...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of mathematical behavior 2020-12, Vol.60, p.100804, Article 100804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Analysis of U.S. and Korean teachers’ written responses to function notation items.•U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules.•U.S. teachers’ meanings are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers.
This study investigates what teachers in U.S. reveal about their meanings for function notation in their written responses to the Mathematical Meanings for Teaching secondary mathematics (MMTsm) items, with particular attention to how productive those meanings would be if conveyed to students in a classroom setting. We then report South Korean teachers’ responses to see whether the meanings U.S. teachers demonstrated are shared with South Korean teachers. The results show that many U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules instead of to represent relationships. The data from South Korean teachers indicates that the problematic meanings in U.S. teachers’ responses are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers. The results suggest a need for attention to ideas regarding function notation in teacher education for pre-service teachers and professional development programs for in-service teachers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-3123 1873-8028 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100804 |