Secondary teachers’ meanings for function notation in the United States and South Korea

•Analysis of U.S. and Korean teachers’ written responses to function notation items.•U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules.•U.S. teachers’ meanings are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers. This study investigates what teachers in U.S. reveal about their meanings for function...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of mathematical behavior 2020-12, Vol.60, p.100804, Article 100804
Hauptverfasser: Yoon, Hyunkyoung, Thompson, Patrick W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Analysis of U.S. and Korean teachers’ written responses to function notation items.•U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules.•U.S. teachers’ meanings are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers. This study investigates what teachers in U.S. reveal about their meanings for function notation in their written responses to the Mathematical Meanings for Teaching secondary mathematics (MMTsm) items, with particular attention to how productive those meanings would be if conveyed to students in a classroom setting. We then report South Korean teachers’ responses to see whether the meanings U.S. teachers demonstrated are shared with South Korean teachers. The results show that many U.S. teachers use function notation to name rules instead of to represent relationships. The data from South Korean teachers indicates that the problematic meanings in U.S. teachers’ responses are shared with a minority of South Korean teachers. The results suggest a need for attention to ideas regarding function notation in teacher education for pre-service teachers and professional development programs for in-service teachers.
ISSN:0732-3123
1873-8028
DOI:10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100804