Does the productivity J-curve exist in Japan?-Empirical studies based on the multiple q theory
•Brynjolfsson et al. (2021) argued that the movements of the standard TFP growth look like J-curve due to the accumulation of unmeasured intangibles during the investment boom for new technologies.•Following their arguments, we revise the standard TFP growth rate and measure the gap between the stan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Japanese and international economies 2021-09, Vol.61, p.101137, Article 101137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Brynjolfsson et al. (2021) argued that the movements of the standard TFP growth look like J-curve due to the accumulation of unmeasured intangibles during the investment boom for new technologies.•Following their arguments, we revise the standard TFP growth rate and measure the gap between the standard TFP and the revised TFP using the estimated parameters of adjustment cost function of investment.•When we focus on the IT-intensive industries, we find the J-curve in the period when the IT revolution started.
Brynjolfsson, Rock, and Syverson (2021) argued that the standard TFP growth is low during an investment boom for new technology such as the IT revolution. As the new capital is operated and productivity improves, the shape of the movements in the standard productivity growth resembles a J-curve. However, when costs associated with investment for new technology are recognized as intangible investment - which is not counted in the conventional value added –, the revised TFP growth including these unmeasured intangibles show different movements from the standard TFP growth. Following Brynjolfsson, Rock, and Syverson (2021), we examine the gap between the standard TFP growth and the revised TFP growth. According to their theory, unmeasured intangibles are estimated by the gap between the shadow value and the price of investment goods. We obtain this shadow value of investment through an estimated parameter in each asset using listed firm-level data and revise the standard TFP growth rate. In the case of all industries, the standard TFP growth is overestimated in most years in the late 1990s and the 2000s, because the growth in intangible investment associated with measured investment is lower than measured capital accumulation rate. When we focus on the IT-intensive industries, we find the productivity J-curve in the late 1990s, at the early stage of the IT revolution, as indicated by Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson (2021). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-1583 1095-8681 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101137 |