Spatiotemporal characteristics and forecasting of short-term meteorological drought in China

•SPEI-5d was longer in northern China and shorter in southern China during 1962–2018.•Seasonal differences in the spatiotemporal distribution of SPEI-5d are large.•ConvLSTM performs the best among five selected machine learning methods. Intense short-term meteorological drought may lead to rapid dec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2023-09, Vol.624, p.129924, Article 129924
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Qi, Miao, Chiyuan, Gou, Jiaojiao, Zheng, Haiyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•SPEI-5d was longer in northern China and shorter in southern China during 1962–2018.•Seasonal differences in the spatiotemporal distribution of SPEI-5d are large.•ConvLSTM performs the best among five selected machine learning methods. Intense short-term meteorological drought may lead to rapid declines in soil moisture, triggering flash drought that can cause major agricultural or socioeconomic damage. Machine learning methods have proven effective in forecasting hydrometeorology, but short-term drought forecasting is still inadequate. We developed a pentad-time-scale (5-day) standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI-5d) to quantify short-term meteorological drought and analyzed its spatiotemporal distribution characteristics in China during the period 1962–2018. We used historical SPEI-5d as input and employed five machine learning methods for drought hindcasting: an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), random forest (RF), recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM). The results show the following: (1) During the period 1962–2018, 61.9% of the study region showed decreasing trends in drought severity, while 69.6% of the region showed increasing trends in drought intensity. (2) Drought duration, severity, and intensity have distinct seasonal characteristics, and different forecasting models perform differently in each season, with generally lower forecasting accuracy in summer and higher forecasting accuracy in winter. (3) The ConvLSTM model can capture spatiotemporal information well compared to traditional time-series forecasting models; it has the best performance (root mean square error = 0.29, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency = 0.92) in the test set and has high forecasting accuracy (R2 > 0.8) for lead times of 1–5 days (with accuracy decreasing as lead time increases). Our findings highlight the spatiotemporal variability of short-term meteorological drought and provide valuable scientific insights for short-term meteorological drought forecasting at 1–5 days of lead time.
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129924