Intercostal nerve cryoablation as part of an opioid-sparing protocol reduces opioid and epidural use after lung transplant

Background: Inadequate pain control after lung transplantation increases perioperative complications. Standard opioid-based regimens are associated with adverse effects and epidural catheters that reduce opioid use are limited by contraindications and technical challenges. We report the use of inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JHLT Open 2024-05, Vol.4, p.100084, Article 100084
Hauptverfasser: Kleiboeker, Hanna L., Hall, David J., Lowery, Erin M., Hayney, Mary S., Maloney, James D., DeCamp, Malcolm M., McCarthy, Daniel P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Inadequate pain control after lung transplantation increases perioperative complications. Standard opioid-based regimens are associated with adverse effects and epidural catheters that reduce opioid use are limited by contraindications and technical challenges. We report the use of intercostal nerve cryoablation to enhance perioperative pain control as part of an opioid-sparing protocol for lung transplant recipients (LTR). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of LTRs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021, before (precryo) and after (postcryo) initiation of an opioid-sparing protocol utilizing intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation. The precryo cohort included consecutive patients treated with opioids and selective use of epidural catheters. The postcryo cohort received intercostal nerve cryoablation at levels 3 to 7, scheduled acetaminophen, gabapentin, and tramadol. Additional opioids or epidural catheters were used for breakthrough pain. Results: In total, 49 precryo and 40 postcryo patients were analyzed. Baseline demographics were similar aside from a shift to performing more bilateral lung transplants in the postcryo cohort (57% vs 95%, p 
ISSN:2950-1334
2950-1334
DOI:10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100084