Employee downsizing and sales internationalization strategy in family firms

•Family firm status is known to have a negative effect on employee downsizing.•This study explores the moderating role of sales internationalization strategy.•The negative effect of family firm status on downsizing is mitigated at higher levels of export intensity.•The negative effect of family firm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of family business strategy 2022-06, Vol.13 (2), p.100354, Article 100354
Hauptverfasser: Cirillo, Alessandro, Muñoz-Bullón, Fernando, Sánchez-Bueno, María J., Sciascia, Salvatore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Family firm status is known to have a negative effect on employee downsizing.•This study explores the moderating role of sales internationalization strategy.•The negative effect of family firm status on downsizing is mitigated at higher levels of export intensity.•The negative effect of family firm status on downsizing is mitigated at higher levels of global focus.•The negative effect of family firm status on downsizing is mitigated when export is done directly. Employee downsizing is a crucial choice that transcends the firm’s boundaries and has profound social implications. While the topic has been on researchers’ agenda for a long time, literature is still looking for a finer understanding of downsizing in family firms, which are the majority of employers worldwide. Using the Socio-Emotional Wealth perspective, this study explores the contingency effect of sales internationalization strategy on the relationship between family firm status and employee downsizing. Based on a large sample of private Spanish firms, our results reveal that the negative effect of family firm status on downsizing is mitigated at higher levels of export intensity, global focus and when export is done directly.
ISSN:1877-8585
1877-8593
DOI:10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100354