Life cycle assessment of AnMBR technology for urban wastewater treatment: A case study based on a demo-scale AnMBR system
This study aims at assessing the environmental performance of a projected full-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating urban wastewater (UWW) at ambient temperature. To this aim, data from an AnMBR demonstration plant equipped with commercially available equipment, including industrial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental chemical engineering 2023-12, Vol.11 (6), p.111141, Article 111141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study aims at assessing the environmental performance of a projected full-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating urban wastewater (UWW) at ambient temperature. To this aim, data from an AnMBR demonstration plant equipped with commercially available equipment, including industrial hollow fiber and degassing membranes, was used for projecting a full-scale facility. The use of real operation data allows to obtain robust results that contribute to improve the knowledge of the environmental performance of this technology, pointing out its strengths and the challenges that still need to be addressed. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied by means of Ecoinvent data base and ReCiPe2016 methodology considering 1 kg of removed COD as functional unit. Additionally, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis were conducted. Energy balance showed AnMBR performing as energy producer (net energy surplus up to −0.688 kWh·kg CODrem−1) and carbon sink (emissions credit up to 0.223 kgCO2eq·kgCODrem−1). Results also showed energy recovery, heavy metals in sludge, dissolved methane in the effluent, and effluent nutrient content as the most important aspects affecting LCA outcome. Construction phase affected some impact categories significantly (e.g., 51–71% in mineral resource scarcity, 18–27% in fossil resource scarcity, 21–28% in water consumption), therefore its exclusion should be carefully evaluated. CHP efficiency, dissolved methane recovery, filtration productivity, membrane scouring, reactor mixing, HRT and SRT appeared most influencing parameters. Finally, actions leading to increase the recovery and valorization of dissolved methane and/or of nutrients through, for instance, fertigation, improve the environmental performance of AnMBR for UWW treatment.
[Display omitted]
•Environmental feasibility of a projected full-scale AnMBR was evaluated.•Results of GHG emissions in the − 0.223:0.020 kgCO2eq·kgCODrem−1 range.•Environmental benefits in most of the impact categories were reached.•Energy and nutrients recovery identified as key factors for AnMBR LCA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2213-3437 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111141 |