Potential contribution of water management practices under intensive crop production to climate-change-associated global warming

Optimizing water management practices to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agroecosystems is of increasing interest under climate change. However, previous studies have focused more on paddy fields, little is known as to how water table management in subsurface drained fields or how irrigation practices in humid areas might affect the global warming potential (GWP). Drawing upon experimental data from four intensive crop production sites in Eastern Canada operating under different water management practices, the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) biogeochemical model was used to assess potential GHG emissions under twelve different sets of General Circulation Models coupled with Regional Climate Models (GCM-RCM) climate projections (2046–2075). Simulations showed that water table control/sub-irrigation and sprinkler irrigation might decrease GWP by allowing greater soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, despite increased N2O and CO2 emissions than non-irrigated systems. While drip irrigation marginally increased the SOC sequestration, GWP still increased because the C gains from the residues generated by the greater crop biomass were offset by increased CO2 and N2O emissions. Compared with surface drip irrigation, subsurface drip irrigation reduced the GWP by reducing N2O emissions, as well as increasing crop yield and SOC stock. Although greater crop biomass was expected to return to soil under projected climate change, simulations showed a consistent increase in the GWP of tomato cropping system alone under climate change. •GHG emissions would increase under climate change projections.•Water table control/subirrigation could decrease the GWP by allowing greater SOC sequestration.•Sprinkler irrigation enhanced SOC and reduced the GWP due to improved crop biomass.•Subsurface drip irrigation increased the GWP due to rising N2O emissions and SOC loss.