Can government regulation weak the gap between green production intention and behavior? Based on the perspective of farmers’ perceptions

Using chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and mulch in traditional agricultural production has caused serious environmental pollution. The practice has proven differences between farmers behaviors and intentions in transforming their production patterns, but the research on bridging the gap between th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2024-01, Vol.434, p.139743, Article 139743
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Chenyujing, Liang, Xiaomeng, Xue, Yanjin, Zhang, Yuan yuan, Xue, Yongji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and mulch in traditional agricultural production has caused serious environmental pollution. The practice has proven differences between farmers behaviors and intentions in transforming their production patterns, but the research on bridging the gap between them is still insufficient. This study explores the influence of farm household perceptions on green production and the role of government regulation based on a conditional process model with a sample of 352 farm households in Jiangsu, China. The results showed that farmers' perceived costs and benefits (economic, social, and environmental benefits) triggered positive decisions to go green. When farmers are aware of the cost, government regulation effectively bridges the gap between farmers' green production intention and behavior. When farmers perceive the economic and environmental benefits of green production, there is a threshold for the moderating effect. This study provides insights for bridging the deviations in farmers’ green behavior from a regulatory perspective for agricultural policymakers. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0959-6526
1879-1786
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139743