Methane emissions and growth performance of beef cattle grazing multi-species swards in different pesticide-free integrated crop-livestock systems in southern Brazil
The aim of this study was to assess the growth performance, forage intake and methane (CH4) emissions by beef cattle grazing under different spatiotemporal integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLSs). The experiment was conducted for two years (2017–2018 and 2018–2019) in warm season perennial pasture...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cleaner production 2023-08, Vol.414, p.137536, Article 137536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of this study was to assess the growth performance, forage intake and methane (CH4) emissions by beef cattle grazing under different spatiotemporal integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLSs). The experiment was conducted for two years (2017–2018 and 2018–2019) in warm season perennial pastures and cool season annual pastures grazed by beef steers. Three pesticide-free ICLS treatments – livestock-forestry (LF); crop-livestock (CL), and crop-livestock-forestry (CLF) – plus, a livestock control pesticide-free system (L) were conducted in randomized complete block design, with three replicates per treatment. Maize crop rotation was done with cool season cover crop under no-tillage. Eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus benthamii) were planted in 2013 and intercropped with tree alleys. The animal performance, organic matter (OM) intake and enteric CH4 emission, yield, and intensity were assessed. We found no significant difference (P > 0.05) for average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), and daily live weight gain (LWG) per area for the different ICLS arrangements and seasons. The ICLS arrangements did not affect (P > 0.05) CH4 emission, yield, and intensity, with averages of 186 g steer−1 day−1, 26 g kg−1 OM intake and 210 g kg−1 of ADG, respectively. The average CH4 emissions per steer per day, per OM intake, per ADG and LWG per area were greater (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137536 |