Improving treatment capacity and process stability via a two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste combining solid-state acidogenesis and leachate methanogenesis/recirculation

Food waste (FW) accounts for the largest category of municipal solid wastes in the United States and the proper disposal of FW is a unique challenge with urgent environmental concerns. Solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) is a viable option to treat FW but still hindered by poor mass transfer and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2021-01, Vol.279, p.123644, Article 123644
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Lingkan, Chen, Yan, Xu, Yongping, Hu, Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Food waste (FW) accounts for the largest category of municipal solid wastes in the United States and the proper disposal of FW is a unique challenge with urgent environmental concerns. Solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) is a viable option to treat FW but still hindered by poor mass transfer and severe inhibition caused by the accumulation of acidic intermediates. To improve the treatment capacity and process stability using high-solid FW as the sole feedstock via AD, a bench-scale two-stage system comprising of a first-stage solid-state digester (Stage 1; 2 L) and a second-stage liquid digester (Stage 2; 1.4 L) was established and carried out in a semi-batch mode for 99 days. When one-stage SSAD started to encounter acid accumulation and methanogenesis inhibition at a FW loading of 300 g (15% of working volume), the two-stage system secured robust and stable biogas production when the FW loading continued rising to 400 g (20% of working volume), and an increase of 2.4 kJ/gVS (equivalent to 18.2% in one-stage system) in energy yield was achieved. Stage 1 served as a hydrolysis/acidogenesis reactor with a total acids level of 28.5 g/L and a pH of 5.65. A large portion of lactic acid in total acids indicated shifts of metabolic pathways. The transfer of acid-rich leachate from Stage 1 to Stage 2 ensured a high methane yield of 393.0 mL/gVS (90.2% of the biological methane potential), while the liquid effluent recirculation provided buffering to Stage 1. Further increase of FW loading triggered a system instability. The enhanced buffering capacity and increased free ammonia molecules, synergistically induced certain inhibitory effects on FW acidogenesis in Stage 1. To conclude, the two-stage system outpaced the one-stage SSAD with higher FW loading and energy yield. [Display omitted] •First-stage solid-state digester and second-stage liquid digester were connected.•Stage 1 served hydrolysis and acidogenesis while Stage 2 served methanogenesis.•Shift of acetic and butyric pathways to lactic pathway was shown in Stage 1.•Food waste loading to two-stage increased by 33.3% as compared to one-stage.•Two-stage outweighed one-stage in specific methane yield by 18.2%.
ISSN:0959-6526
1879-1786
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123644