The lingering living dead phenomenon: Distorting venture survival studies?

Despite the increased attention dedicated to research on the antecedents and determinants of new venture survival in entrepreneurship, defining and capturing survival as an outcome represents a challenge in quantitative studies. This paper creates awareness for ventures being inactive while still cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Business Venturing Insights 2021-11, Vol.16, p.e00250, Article e00250
Hauptverfasser: Ungerer, Christina, Reuther, Kevin, Baltes, Guido
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite the increased attention dedicated to research on the antecedents and determinants of new venture survival in entrepreneurship, defining and capturing survival as an outcome represents a challenge in quantitative studies. This paper creates awareness for ventures being inactive while still classified as surviving based on the data available. We describe this as the ‘living dead’ phenomenon, arguing that it yields potential effects on the empirical results of survival studies. Based on a systematic literature review, we find that this issue of inactivity has not been sufficiently considered in previous new venture survival studies. Based on a sample of 501 New Technology-Based Firms, we empirically illustrate that the classification of living dead ventures into either survived or failed can impact the factors determining survival. On this basis, we contribute to an understanding of the issue by defining the ‘living dead’ phenomenon and by proposing recommendations for research practice to solve this issue in survival studies, taking the data source, the period under investigation and the sample size into account. •Venture inactivity in survival studies constitutes the living dead phenomenon.•Previous survival studies classified inactive ventures as either dead or alive.•Inactivity has not yet been sufficiently addressed in new venture survival studies.•The classification of living deads can statistically distort survival study results.•We advise how future survival studies should take living dead ventures into account.
ISSN:2352-6734
2352-6734
DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00250