Is the door really open? A contingent model of boundary spanning behavior and abusive supervisory behavior

•Subordinate BSB results in supervisor perceived status threat only when supervisors’ managerial self-efficacy (MSE) is low (vs. high).•Supervisor perceived status threat leads to abusive supervisory behavior (AS).•Supervisor perceived status threat mediates the interactive effect of subordinate BSB...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business research 2023-12, Vol.169, p.114284, Article 114284
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Xiao-Yun, Wei, Junjie, Hu, Qiongjing, Liao, Zhenyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Subordinate BSB results in supervisor perceived status threat only when supervisors’ managerial self-efficacy (MSE) is low (vs. high).•Supervisor perceived status threat leads to abusive supervisory behavior (AS).•Supervisor perceived status threat mediates the interactive effect of subordinate BSB and supervisor MSE on AS. Although research suggests that subordinates’ boundary spanning may result in unintended negative responses from their supervisors, little is known about which supervisors are likely to react adversely and which are not. We draw on self-protection theory to answer this question. Specifically, we argue that when supervisors experience low levels of managerial self-efficacy, boundary spanning behavior threatens their perceived work status within the team, resulting in abusive supervisory behavior. The results of two field survey studies and an experimental study support our hypotheses. Our research identifies managerial barriers that may hinder boundary spanning behavior at work and provides invaluable insights into how upper-level organizations may create constructive work contexts that encourage employees to engage in such behavior.
ISSN:0148-2963
1873-7978
DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114284