African elephant bones modified by carnivores: Implications for interpreting fossil proboscidean assemblages

•Carnivores mark, move, break, and subtract bones of African elephants in documented patterns.•Bone-gnawing intensity varies with carcass abundance and prior human involvement in carcass utilization.•Worn carnivore teeth make different tooth marks from unworn teeth, which has implications for carniv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of archaeological science, reports reports, 2020-12, Vol.34, p.102596, Article 102596
Hauptverfasser: Haynes, Gary, Hutson, Jarod
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Carnivores mark, move, break, and subtract bones of African elephants in documented patterns.•Bone-gnawing intensity varies with carcass abundance and prior human involvement in carcass utilization.•Worn carnivore teeth make different tooth marks from unworn teeth, which has implications for carnivore feeding ecology.•Carnivore modifications to mammoth bones are similar, implying similar bone-gnawing behaviors. Carcasses of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana africana) are affected by large and small carnivores which mark, move, break, and subtract bones. Bone-gnawing scavengers modify proboscidean carcasses and individual bones in patterned sequences. We summarize how scavengers modify major skeletal elements in stages which may reflect the extent of carcass utilization. The stages of modification also may be detectable in fossil proboscidean assemblages, which would potentially strengthen ecological interpretations of assemblage origins. We discuss the significance of tooth marking and breakage of bones, different bone-gnawing behaviors, variations in intensity of gnawing, and the effects of increasingly worn carnivore teeth. We demonstrate that tooth marks made by carnivores which are habitual bone-gnawing scavengers have substantially different sizes from tooth marks made by conspecifics with less worn teeth, an unexplored complication when attempting to identify taxon of scavenging carnivores in fossil proboscidean assemblages. Herein we provide a guide for identifying carnivore effects on proboscidean bones, which may partially or wholly reduce analysts’ variability in reporting frequencies of carnivore modifications in fossil proboscidean assemblages.
ISSN:2352-409X
DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102596