Geoelectrical properties of saline permafrost soil in the Adventdalen valley of Svalbard (Norway), constrained with in-situ well data

Direct Current (DC) Resistivity and Induced Polarization (IP) response of six profiles were measured using the Gradient electrode configuration in Adventdalen, Svalbard, to characterise the near-surface stratigraphy of the soil and to account for geotechnical and environmental aspects of global warm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied geophysics 2021-12, Vol.195, p.104497, Article 104497
Hauptverfasser: Tavakoli, Saman, Gilbert, Graham, Lysdahl, Asgeir Olaf Kydland, Frauenfelder, Regula, Forsberg, Cathinka Schaanning
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Direct Current (DC) Resistivity and Induced Polarization (IP) response of six profiles were measured using the Gradient electrode configuration in Adventdalen, Svalbard, to characterise the near-surface stratigraphy of the soil and to account for geotechnical and environmental aspects of global warming in the arctic region. In addition, Wenner array data was collected for the selected profiles to examine its effectiveness as compared to the Gradient array, given the characteristics of the study site. Two commercial inversion software programs, Res2DINV and AarhusINV, were used for the inversion of the DC resistivity and IP data, to compare the software. Physical soil properties, including porosity, water saturation, water salinity, freezing temperature and grain size distribution, previously measured from samples retrieved from wells along the studied profiles, were integrated in this study to investigate the correlation with geoelectrical properties of the sediments inferred from the DC resistivity and IP data. Results from processing of the Wenner array DC resistivity data provided higher resolution as compared to the Gradient array data, especially from deeper parts of the models, due to its higher signal-to-noise ratio. The Wenner array data also indicated better inversion result for the IP data as distinctive anomalies were better indicated in data from Wenner array survey. The Wenner array data also provided a realistic trend for the anomalies, thanks to the symmetrical geometry of the electrodes during the survey, although at the cost of time and higher expenses. Inversion results proved that AarhusINV resolved the geometry of the subsurface layers with higher resolution compared with the Res2DINV. However, the two inversion algorithms use slightly different parameters for the processing and for presenting the results, thus only allowing qualitative comparison. Based on the interpretations of the DC resistivity and IP data, four distinctive zones were identified from the surface to the maximum depth of 26 m, consisting of (i) unfrozen active-layer-(silts and sands), with intermediate resistivity values 200–300 Ω·m; (ii) frozen soil with 3–10 m thickness and resistivity values between 2500 and 5000 Ω·m; (iii) unfrozen soil (cryopeg) with high salinity and low resistivity of 40 Ω·m; and finally (iv) clayey-unfrozen soil sediments with low resistivity ranging 10–20 Ω·m, at depths between 13 and 26 m. The IP data allowed for the delineation of a low cha
ISSN:0926-9851
1879-1859
DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104497