Fishing for “lucky stones”: Symbolic uses of otoliths in Brazilian shell sites

•Otoliths are ubiquitous in funerary contexts from Jabuticabeira II shell mound site.•Seven burials contain over 100 otoliths, accounting for a minimum of 69 fish.•Data indicates that otoliths were selected for special deposition in ritual contexts.•Results suggest differential role of croakers and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anthropological archaeology 2020-06, Vol.58, p.101167, Article 101167
1. Verfasser: Klokler, Daniela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Otoliths are ubiquitous in funerary contexts from Jabuticabeira II shell mound site.•Seven burials contain over 100 otoliths, accounting for a minimum of 69 fish.•Data indicates that otoliths were selected for special deposition in ritual contexts.•Results suggest differential role of croakers and catfish for ancient coastal groups. Otoliths are concretions of aragonite located in fish neurocrania, also popularly known as “lucky stones”. These elements are commonly found in Brazilian shell mounds and middens, and have long been regarded as a by-product of food processing and consumption. Zooarchaeologists commonly use them to identify species, estimate age, quantify fish, and to discuss capture methods and seasonality of occupation, among other aspects of fish and human populations. My research at Jabuticabeira II, a cemetery site with large quantities of otoliths closely associated with burials, explores alternative uses of otoliths by past coastal populations that inhabited the southern Brazilian coast. I reviewed ethnographic and historical accounts of the use of otoliths to check distinct uses of these fish elements. I analyzed 9258 otoliths and 76,990 fish bones from Jabuticabeira II to identify patterns of fragmentation, thermal alteration, element representation and distribution across contexts. The results indicate that otoliths were deliberately placed in burials, pointing to the symbolic value of otoliths. This research reinforces the need to consider the non-economic uses of fish by pre-historic populations.
ISSN:0278-4165
1090-2686
DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101167