CLeBPI: Contrastive Learning for Bug Priority Inference
Automated bug priority inference (BPI) can reduce the time overhead of bug triagers for priority assignments, improving the efficiency of software maintenance. There are two orthogonal lines for this task, i.e., traditional machine learning based (TML-based) and neural network based (NN-based) appro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information and software technology 2023-12, Vol.164, p.107302, Article 107302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Automated bug priority inference (BPI) can reduce the time overhead of bug triagers for priority assignments, improving the efficiency of software maintenance.
There are two orthogonal lines for this task, i.e., traditional machine learning based (TML-based) and neural network based (NN-based) approaches. Although these approaches achieve competitive performance, our observation finds that existing approaches face the following two issues: 1) TML-based approaches require much manual feature engineering and cannot learn the semantic information of bug reports; 2) Both TML-based and NN-based approaches cannot effectively address the label imbalance problem because they are difficult to distinguish the semantic difference between bug reports with different priorities.
We propose CLeBPI (Contrastive Learning for Bug Priority Inference), which leverages pre-trained language model and contrastive learning to tackle the above-mentioned two issues. Specifically, CLeBPI is first pre-trained on a large-scale bug report corpus in a self-supervised way, thus it can automatically learn contextual representations of bug reports without manual feature engineering. Afterward, it is further pre-trained by a contrastive learning objective, which enables it to distinguish semantic differences between bug reports, learning more precise contextual representations for each bug report. When finishing pre-training, we can connect a classification layer to CLeBPI and fine-tune it for BPI in a supervised way.
We choose four baseline approaches and conduct comparison experiments on a public dataset. The experimental results show that CLeBPI outperforms all baseline approaches by 23.86%–77.80% in terms of weighted average F1-score, showing its effectiveness.
This paper propose CLeBPI, a pre-trained model combining contrastive learning that can automatically predict bug priority. Experimental results show that It achieves new result in BPI and can effectively alleviate label imbalance problem. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-5849 1873-6025 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107302 |