Evaluation of the multi-sensor probe methods for the measurement of local bubble velocity and diameter

The evaluation of the multi-sensor probe methodology is required to accurately measure local bubbles or droplet parameters in the two-phase flow conditions. This study evaluated two- and four-sensor probes through Monte Carlo simulation and air-water benchmark experiments. In the simulation, it was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International communications in heat and mass transfer 2022-06, Vol.135, p.106146, Article 106146
Hauptverfasser: Moon, Jeongmin, Ko, Youngchang, Nam, Sang Gyun, Jeong, Jae Jun, Yun, Byongjo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The evaluation of the multi-sensor probe methodology is required to accurately measure local bubbles or droplet parameters in the two-phase flow conditions. This study evaluated two- and four-sensor probes through Monte Carlo simulation and air-water benchmark experiments. In the simulation, it was found that the lateral distance of sensing elements should be minimized, and their axial distance should be longer than 10% of bubble diameter for the optimal design of the probe. From the benchmark experiments, the Vb,axial uncertainties of two- and four-sensor probes were 6.5% and 4.5% in the velocity range of 0.4–3.7 m/s, respectively. The D32 uncertainty was significantly affected by the bubble shape and data reduction methods for each probe. For the two-sensor probe, the maximum error was 9% when the bubble shape was close to the sphere of which diameter was less than 2 mm, and it increased to 28% when the bubble diameter exceeded 2 mm due to the bubble shape distortion in the experiment. While, the four-sensor probe showed excellent performance with a 14% error regardless of the bubble shape under the distorted bubbly flow. •The multi-sensor probe methodology was numerically and experimentally evaluated.•The Vb uncertainties of the two- and four-sensors were 6.5% and 4.5%, respectively.•The optimal probe type for D32 was suggested considering the bubble shape.•The best multi-sensor probe methods were suggested for the bubble parameters.
ISSN:0735-1933
1879-0178
DOI:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106146