A systematic review of labor-saving technologies: Implications for women in agriculture
In this study, we systematically review the literature on adoption factors and impacts of labor-saving technologies (LSTs) by smallholder and women farmers in developing countries. 85 articles are included in the review after meeting strict selection criteria through a search across several electron...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global food security 2021-06, Vol.29, p.100541, Article 100541 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we systematically review the literature on adoption factors and impacts of labor-saving technologies (LSTs) by smallholder and women farmers in developing countries. 85 articles are included in the review after meeting strict selection criteria through a search across several electronic platforms. We highlight several research gaps that need future research focus. Future research should include gendered differences in factors such as – comparing extension models, social networks, and farmers' underlying technological perceptions. We show the need for designing and providing access to gender-friendly LSTs suited to the context. While there are clear impacts of LST adoption on labor and productivity, few studies examine negative consequences such as labor-displacement. Further examination of these trade-offs and differential impacts on welfare dimensions across gender is needed. Our results indicate implications for future research and policy regarding incorporating gender differences in designing, promotion, and adoption of LSTs to reduce womnen's work burdens and to enhance welfare outcomes.
•We systematically review labor-saving technologies adoption in developing countries.•Availability & dissemination of gender-friendly technologies are vital.•Future research on perceptions towards LSTs across & extension is needed.•Few studies examine trade-offs and differential impacts across gender.•LST adoption is vital for equity & reducing work burdens among women farmers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-9124 2211-9124 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100541 |