No effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on hydraulic properties of biochar and amended sandy soil
[Display omitted] •Pure biochar hydraulic properties similar across feedstocks, except for rice husk 700 °C.•Differences between rice husk 700 °C and other tested biochars likely due to hydrophobicity.•Biochar does not affect water retention, hydrophobicity and Ksat of a sandy soil.•Low application...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoderma 2020-04, Vol.364, p.114209, Article 114209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Pure biochar hydraulic properties similar across feedstocks, except for rice husk 700 °C.•Differences between rice husk 700 °C and other tested biochars likely due to hydrophobicity.•Biochar does not affect water retention, hydrophobicity and Ksat of a sandy soil.•Low application rate main reason for absence of effects of biochar on soil hydraulic properties.
Biochar has been lauded as a cure-all for improving water availability in soils. Yet the effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on biochar hydraulic properties and its subsequent effects on soils are not well known. We therefore systematically studied water retention, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) and hydrophobicity of 12 standard biochars (six feedstocks and two pyrolysis temperatures) developed by the UK Biochar Research Centre. The hydraulic properties were determined for pure crushed biochar, as well as for a sandy soil amended with 10 t ha−1 biochar (assessed three times over a period of 15 months). For pure biochar, the effect of feedstock-temperature treatments on the water retention curve was negligible. Rice husk at a pyrolysis temperature of 700 °C had a significantly lower saturated water content, plant available water content and Ksat than all other biochar treatments. This can be attributed to its severe hydrophobicity: while all other treatments were non-hydrophobic and rice husk at 550 °C and Miscanthus straw at 550 °C were both strongly hydrophobic, rice husk at 700 °C was severely hydrophobic. Incorporation of the biochar into a sandy soil did not significantly influence soil water retention, saturated hydraulic conductivity and hydrophobicity. There were also no significant differences between the biochar treatments. These results indicate that except for rice husk at 700 °C the different biochar feedstock types and pyrolysis temperatures yield surprisingly similar material in terms of hydraulic characteristics. Improved soil hydrology should not be a main reason to apply biochar on sandy soils, but if biochar is applied differences in hydrophobicity should be considered. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-7061 1872-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114209 |