Non-fungible token artworks: More crypto than art?
•We study whether the market for NFTs crypto art is informationally efficient.•We also analyze if crypto art shares common features with real-world art.•We find that crypto art market is informationally inefficient, with autoregressive patterns.•Crypto art is unrelated to real-world art as its price...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Finance research letters 2023-01, Vol.51, p.103473, Article 103473 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We study whether the market for NFTs crypto art is informationally efficient.•We also analyze if crypto art shares common features with real-world art.•We find that crypto art market is informationally inefficient, with autoregressive patterns.•Crypto art is unrelated to real-world art as its price is primarily driven by cryptocurrency.•Crypto art represents a haven for traders to store crypto money.
Non-Fungible Tokens (NTFs) artworks attract relevant trading volume in the secondary market. Their prices, primarily denominated in Ethereum cryptocurrency, recently experienced a substantial increase. In this paper, we first investigate whether the market for crypto art is informationally efficient and, secondly, if crypto art can be considered as an alternative to real-world art rather than a haven for crypto-money speculative traders. We find evidence of market inefficiency with long-lasting autoregressive patterns in price discovery. As for the nature of crypto art as an asset class, our findings support the idea that crypto art is unrelated to real-world art. Crypto art prices are mostly determined by gains in the cryptocurrency of denomination, whereas real-world art is mostly unrelated to the financial markets. We conclude that crypto art is far from being another medium to express artistic content and is currently just a storing unit for crypto-money, in absence of relevant alternatives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1544-6123 1544-6131 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103473 |