Effect of test parameters on the punching-shear strength of precast tunnel segments reinforced with GFRP bars

•Punching-shear strength of GFRP reinforced precast concrete tunnel lining (PCTL) segments.•Effects of concrete strength and GFRP reinforcement ratio on punching behavior of PCTL.•Punching-shear failure mechanism of PCTL reinforced with GFRP bars.•Deformability and energy absorption of PCTL reinforced with GFRP bars.•Design Equations to predict punching-shear strength of GFRP reinforced PCTL. While assessing the load cases is crucial for designing the precast concrete tunnel lining (PCTL) segments, none of the tunnel-specific standards or codes explicitly consider punching-shear loads. This study aimed at determining the structural performance of full-scale precast concrete tunnel segments reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The segments were constructed with a rhomboidal shape measuring 2100 × 1500 × 250 mm and subjected to point loading on their extrados surfaces until failure. Such loading simulates the geotechnical exposure conditions surrounding tunnels, such as rock expansion. The effects of concrete strength and GFRP flexural reinforcement ratio on the punching behavior were analyzed and are discussed herein. The load–deflection response, failure mode, punching strength, cracking behavior, reinforcement and concrete strain, deformability, and energy absorption were all evaluated in the experiments. The results reveal that increasing both the flexural reinforcement ratio and concrete strength enhanced the punching response and decreased crack width. In addition, using HSC in tunnel segments yielded higher pre-cracking stiffness, punching-shear capacity, and energy absorption. A theoretical investigation involving a comparison between predictions of the FRP-reinforced concrete slab design provisions and experimental results was performed to assess the applicability of the current punching equations for PCTL segments. The equations in the FRP-reinforced concrete codes predicted the punching capacities conservatively, while the researchers’ proposed equations overestimated. Moreover, CAN/CSA S806-12 showed the most accurate prediction of the punching capacity even if the concrete compressive strength exceeded 60 MPa.