Size effect of large high strength concrete beams with or without shear reinforcement
•Seven large high strength concrete (HSC) beams, up to 1800 mm in depth and 13400 mm in span, with/without shear reinforcement, were tested in the research programme.•Reduction in ultimate shear strength was observed with increasing beam depth, regardless of the maximum aggregate size and web reinfo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2023-04, Vol.281, p.115733, Article 115733 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Seven large high strength concrete (HSC) beams, up to 1800 mm in depth and 13400 mm in span, with/without shear reinforcement, were tested in the research programme.•Reduction in ultimate shear strength was observed with increasing beam depth, regardless of the maximum aggregate size and web reinforcement ratio.•ACI 318–14 overestimated shear strengths of large HSC beams without web steels, while ACI 318–19 and EC2 yielded conservative predictions by accounting for the size effect.•Use of smaller aggregates results in a higher ultimate strength for the beams that is not accounted for by the existing codes of practice.•Predictions by ACI 318–14, ACI 318–19 and EN 1992–1-1 for the HSC beams with minimum shear reinforcement were generally conservative.
This paper presents a research programme conducted on a total of seven large high strength concrete (HSC) beams, up to 1800 mm in depth and 13400 mm in span, with and without shear reinforcement in the web. This study investigates experimentally the effects of aggregate size, shear reinforcement ratio, and effective depth on shear strength of large HSC beams. In addition, the test data are adopted for verification of design provisions in ACI 318–14, ACI 318–19 and EN 1992–1-1. It is experimentally shown that reduction in ultimate shear strength was observed with increasing beam depth, regardless of the maximum aggregate size and web reinforcement ratio. A larger beam depth led to a more extensive development of flexural and shear cracks, as well as a greater beam stiffness. Besides, the use of smaller aggregates results in a higher ultimate strength (in MPa) for the beams. Shear equations from ACI 318–14 overestimated shear strengths of the large HSC beams without web reinforcement, while ACI 318–19 and EN 1992–1-1 predictions were more conservative by accounting for the size effect term. It is also shown that the existing codes of practice could not account for the effect of aggregate size when determining shear strength. Additionally, predictions by all the three codes for the HSC beams with minimum shear reinforcement were generally conservative. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115733 |