Probabilistic capacity energy-based machine learning models for soil liquefaction reliability analysis
The energy-based method has been widely employed to evaluate soil liquefaction potential. A recent trend is to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict capacity energy. However, there is still a lack of statistical perspectives on energy-based ML models for liquefaction risk analysis. This st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering geology 2024-08, Vol.338, p.107613, Article 107613 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The energy-based method has been widely employed to evaluate soil liquefaction potential. A recent trend is to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict capacity energy. However, there is still a lack of statistical perspectives on energy-based ML models for liquefaction risk analysis. This study develops a rigorous Bayesian framework for characterizing uncertainties of two typical energy-based ML models and developing probabilistic versions. Performance of ML models is evaluated and compared from a statistical perspective using Bayesian model comparison approach. The effects of test data quality and data quantity are also comprehensively investigated. The probabilistic model is finally verified against real cases. Results show that the occurrence probability of artificial neural network model is higher than that of support vector machine model. The model uncertainty is more sensitive to uncertainties in soil textural properties and fines content than inter-granular contact density. The predicted liquefaction probabilities are in good agreement with field observations and superior to the traditional method. This study can extend the use of the energy-based methods and provide performance-based risk evaluation of soil liquefaction potential.
•Uncertainties in energy-based ML models are characterized.•Performance of typical ML models is statistically evaluated and compared.•Practical PL–FS relationships for ML models are developed.•Predicted results compel well with the field observation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-7952 1872-6917 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107613 |