The effect of market power on the inter-temporal allocation of abatement under a rate-based emissions trading scheme
Imperfect competition in permit markets negatively affects the cost-effectiveness of emissions trading schemes by distorting the abatement allocation across both firms and periods. Different from most studies examining the inter-firm effect of market power, we focus on the inter-temporal effect when...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy economics 2024-08, Vol.136, p.1-15, Article 107715 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Imperfect competition in permit markets negatively affects the cost-effectiveness of emissions trading schemes by distorting the abatement allocation across both firms and periods. Different from most studies examining the inter-firm effect of market power, we focus on the inter-temporal effect when only permit banking is allowed. In this study, two-period models are developed under a rate-based scheme where one dominant firm and some followers are included, and we examine the effect of market power in the permit market and the strategic interplay between output and permit markets on the inter-temporal allocation of abatement. We find that the influence mechanism of market power depends on the relationship between discounted permit prices and that the strategic interaction between markets can intensify the inter-temporal effect. Moreover, the inter-temporal allocation might still be inefficient even though the condition for removing efficiency loss caused by market power in a single period holds. We also perform simulations based on China's iron and steel industry and find that the dominant firm will have an incentive to decrease the growth rate of the permit price for a higher profit when borrowing is prohibited.
•Two-period analytical models are constructed when prohibiting borrowing.•The effect of the prohibition of borrowing on the price manipulation is explored.•The effect of the strategic interplay is examined.•The influence mechanism depends on the relationship between discounted permit prices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-9883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107715 |