Sustainable energy storage solutions for coal-fired power plants: A comparative study on the integration of liquid air energy storage and hydrogen energy storage systems

•Minimizing energy loss & CO2 emissions of power plants is crucial for sustainability.•Plant output decreases by 4–15% for LAES/HES charging at full load for the base case.•HES needs less storage volume than LAES for the same energy storage capacity (MWh).•Discharging hydrogen in fuel cells performs better than co-firing in the boiler.•LAES/HES integration reduces exergy loss & enhances net unit efficiency by 3–10%. With the majority of the world's energy demand still reliant on fossil fuels, particularly coal, mitigating the substantial carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from coal-fired power plants is imperative for achieving a net-zero carbon future. Energy storage technologies offer a viable solution to provide better flexibility against load fluctuations and reduce the carbon footprint of coal-fired power plants by minimizing exergy losses, thereby achieving better energy efficiency. This work focuses on developing two such energy storage technologies: Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) and Hydrogen Energy Storage (HES), and their integration strategies with a sub-critical coal-fired power plant. The performance of the integrated systems is analyzed based on key parameters like energy storage capacity, net unit power output during charging and discharging, round-trip efficiencies, and net unit efficiencies at different operating load conditions of the plant. Our results show that during the charging cycles, by increasing the air flow rate in LAES and the hydrogen production rate in HES, the net unit efficiency of the integrated plant decreases by 3–10% at different load conditions, while the energy-based round-trip efficiency increases with increasing liquid air and hydrogen flow rates during the discharge cycles. For the HES system, utilization of the produced hydrogen in the fuel cells gives 40–50% better roundtrip efficiencies than co-firing hydrogen in the boiler at full and minimum load and it increases with increasing hydrogen flow rates. While HES has shown a better overall net unit efficiency (41.5%, in fuel cell scenario) of the integrated unit than the LAES system (40%) for the base case operation, LAES shows superior round-trip efficiencies when operated at higher liquid air discharge flow rates (>80 kg/s). The results provide insights into the system modeling of LAES and HES integrated with a sub-critical coal power plant, contributing to the advancement of sustainable energy storage solutions.