Removal of bottom-towed fishing from whole-site Marine Protected Areas promotes mobile species biodiversity

Marine habitats are being altered by anthropogenic pressures, influencing the diversity and distribution of species. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are increasingly used as spatial management tools to mitigate these human impacts on marine systems, but levels of protection vary. MPAs that exclude bot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 2022-10, Vol.276, p.108033, Article 108033
Hauptverfasser: Blampied, Samantha R., Rees, Sian E., Attrill, Martin J., Binney, Francis C.T., Sheehan, Emma V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Marine habitats are being altered by anthropogenic pressures, influencing the diversity and distribution of species. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are increasingly used as spatial management tools to mitigate these human impacts on marine systems, but levels of protection vary. MPAs that exclude bottom-towed fishing activities from all habitats within their boundaries while still allowing static gear fishing, taking a “whole-site approach”, have shown benefits in terms of increasing biodiversity and biomass on reef habitat. In this study we use Baited Remote Underwater Videos (BRUVs) to quantify differences in mobile species assemblage composition, diversity and abundance on mixed sediment habitats inside and outside three MPAs adopting this whole-site approach within Jersey's territorial waters. Greater numbers of taxa were recorded within all three MPAs compared to nearby unprotected areas, with an average of 4.9 ± 1.8 taxa observed per deployment inside the MPAs compared to 3.9 ± 1.7 taxa outside the MPAs. No significant difference was observed in the overall abundance. The proportion of presence of two indicator species (Labridae Spp. and juvenile bream Spondyliosoma cantharus) was greater within the MPAs than the nearby unprotected areas. IUCN threatened and vulnerable shark species were observed on more BRUVs inside the MPAs, while IUCN threatened and vulnerable ray species were present on fewer BRUVs in the MPAs, but both occurred in too few numbers to statistically assess. Not all species responded positively to the MPAs, with scavenging species such as spider crab (Maja brachydactyla) recorded in lower numbers in two out of the three MPAs compared to the nearby unprotected areas. BRUV surveys that have been used to survey MPAs that exclude bottom-towed fishing in Europe are sparse and have primarily focussed on reef habitat. This study provides the first account of how this whole-site approach for mixed sediment habitats in three MPAs affects mobile species. These results evidence the merit of an ecosystem-based approach to MPA management for species of both conservation and commercial importance. •Recovery detected in whole-site Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) three years after designation.•Interstitial habitats between reef features show increased species richness following protection from bottom towed fishing.•An ecosystem-based approach to marine management supports biodiversity.•Feature-based MPAs in the UK may not be not fulfilling their poten
ISSN:0272-7714
1096-0015
DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2022.108033