The impact of team incentives on performance in graduate school: Evidence from two pilot RCTs
In organizations, teams are ubiquitous. “Weakest Link” and “Best Shot” are incentive schemes that tie a group member’s compensation to the output of their group’s least and most productive member, respectively. In this paper, we test the impact of these incentive schemes by conducting two pilot RCTs...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics letters 2022-12, Vol.221, p.110894, Article 110894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In organizations, teams are ubiquitous. “Weakest Link” and “Best Shot” are incentive schemes that tie a group member’s compensation to the output of their group’s least and most productive member, respectively. In this paper, we test the impact of these incentive schemes by conducting two pilot RCTs (one in-person, one online), which included more than 250 graduate students in a graduate math class. Students were placed in study groups of three or four students, and then groups were randomized to either control, Weakest Link, or Best Shot incentives. We find evidence that such incentive approaches can affect test scores, both in-person and online.
•We conducted two RCTs on team incentives with graduate students in a math class.•A group’s highest (Best Shot) or lowest (Weakest Link) scorer determined payout.•Weakest Link treatment boosted the minimum group score, but only in the online RCT.•Best Shot boosted the minimum group score in both the online and in-person RCTs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-1765 1873-7374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110894 |