The embodied flow of built-up land in China's interregional trade and its implications for regional carbon balance
Built-up land intensively concentrates human activities, and its area or the changes in its intensity dramatically affect the regional carbon balance. This study proposed a new framework to assess how in China, the interregional trade's use of built-up land affects regional carbon balance with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological economics 2021-06, Vol.184, p.106993, Article 106993 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Built-up land intensively concentrates human activities, and its area or the changes in its intensity dramatically affect the regional carbon balance. This study proposed a new framework to assess how in China, the interregional trade's use of built-up land affects regional carbon balance with regard to the initial maintained land and the expanded built-up land. Then, a multiregional input−output model was used to simultaneously analyse China's built-up land flow in interregional trade and the effect on carbon balance. Finally, hidden regional inequality was analysed. The results show that the domestic trade pulled indirect external built-up land use reached to 100286 km2 in 2012 and caused 28084 × 104 t external province pulled carbon emissions for whole China, including 286 × 104 t from vegetation carbon storage loss. Regionally, more developed regions were always net receivers of built-up land use, in contrast, less developed regions more frequently acted as net suppliers, but most regions experienced economic and environmental deficits. The majority of other provinces experienced a contradictory status of loss of economic profit or environmental profit. For sustainable development and regional equality, more developed regions should provide more economic and technological support for effective built-up land use and emissions reduction to less developed regions.
•More developed regions were always net receivers of built-up land.•More developed regions always gained economy and environment profits.•Less developed regions more frequently acted as net suppliers of built-up land.•Most less developed regions experienced economic and environmental deficits. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106993 |