Outcomes and toxicities of re-irradiation for prostate cancer: A systematic review on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

•Management of relapses of irradiated prostate cancer patients is not standardized.•Re-irradiation (Re-I) could be an option after local relapse.•We performed a literature review analysing outcomes and toxicities after Re-I.•Re-irradiation showed promising overall survival and biochemical control ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer treatment reviews 2021-04, Vol.95, p.102176, Article 102176
Hauptverfasser: Munoz, Fernando, Fiorica, Francesco, Caravatta, Luciana, Rosa, Consuelo, Ferella, Letizia, Boldrini, Luca, Fionda, Bruno, Alitto, Anna Rita, Nardangeli, Alessia, Dionisi, Francesco, Arcangeli, Stefano, Di Marzo, Alessandro, Pontoriero, Antonio, Donato, Vittorio, Massaccesi, Mariangela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Management of relapses of irradiated prostate cancer patients is not standardized.•Re-irradiation (Re-I) could be an option after local relapse.•We performed a literature review analysing outcomes and toxicities after Re-I.•Re-irradiation showed promising overall survival and biochemical control rates.•Re-irradiation of prostate cancer patients showed a safe toxicity profile. The best therapeutic approach for local relapses of previously irradiated prostate cancer (PC) is still not defined. Re-irradiation (Re-I) could offer a chance of cure for highly selected patients, although high quality evidences are lacking. The aim of our study is to provide a literature review on efficacy and safety of Re-I. Only studies where Re-I field overlaps with previous radiotherapy were considered. To determine 2 and 4 years overall mortality (OM), 2 and 4 years biochemical failure (BF) and pooled acute and late G ≥ 3 toxicities rate, a meta-analysis over single arm study was performed. Thirty-eight studies with 1194 patients were included. Median follow-up from Re-I was 30 months (10–94 months). Brachytherapy (BRT) was the most used Re-I technique (27 studies), followed by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) (9) and External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) (2). Re-I prescription doses ranged from 19 Gy in single HDR fraction to 145 Gy (interstitial BRT). The pooled 2 and 4 years OM rates were 2.1% (95%CI:1.1–3.7%, P 
ISSN:0305-7372
1532-1967
DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102176