Spoofing countermeasure for fake speech detection using brute force features
Due to the progress in deep learning technology, techniques that generate spoofed speech have significantly emerged. Such synthetic speech can be exploited for harmful purposes, like impersonation or disseminating false information. Researchers in the area investigate the useful features for spoof d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer speech & language 2025-03, Vol.90, p.101732, Article 101732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Due to the progress in deep learning technology, techniques that generate spoofed speech have significantly emerged. Such synthetic speech can be exploited for harmful purposes, like impersonation or disseminating false information. Researchers in the area investigate the useful features for spoof detection. This paper extensively investigates three problems in spoof detection in speech, namely, the imbalanced sample per class, which may negatively affect the performance of any detection models, the effect of the feature early and late fusion, and the analysis of unseen attacks on the model. Regarding the imbalanced issue, we have proposed two approaches (a Synthetic Minority Over Sampling Technique (SMOTE)-based and a Bootstrap-based model). We have used the OpenSMILE toolkit, to extract different feature sets, their results and early and late fusion of them have been investigated. The experiments are evaluated using the ASVspoof 2019 datasets which encompass synthetic, voice-conversion, and replayed speech samples. Additionally, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) have been adopted in the classification. The outcomes from various test scenarios indicated that neither the imbalanced nature of the dataset nor a specific feature or their fusions outperformed the brute force version of the model as the best Equal Error Rate (EER) achieved by the Imbalance model is 6.67 % and 1.80 % for both Logical Access (LA) and Physical Access (PA) respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-2308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.csl.2024.101732 |