Monitoring the self-healing evolution of cementitious mixtures with superabsorbent polymers through air-coupled ultrasound
•Effect of various superabsorbent polymers on the self-healing ability.•Benchmarking of air-coupled ultrasound for self-healing monitoring through a comparison with coupled ultrasonic measurements.•Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation follow crack closure as measured by microscopy. Self-healing cemen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Construction & building materials 2023-12, Vol.408, p.133746, Article 133746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Effect of various superabsorbent polymers on the self-healing ability.•Benchmarking of air-coupled ultrasound for self-healing monitoring through a comparison with coupled ultrasonic measurements.•Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation follow crack closure as measured by microscopy.
Self-healing cementitious composites including superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) have been studied as an alternative to costly, labour-intensive repairs. Whereas the assessment of the healing ability can be performed through a variety of testing methodologies, an in-situ evaluation requires the adoption of a non-destructive technique in order to maintain the present infrastructure. Additionally, the assessment method should be easily applicable for reasons of time efficiency. Thanks to their sensitivity to the elastic properties, ultrasonic waves have enabled the evaluation of the regained mechanical performance, without interfering with the microstructure. While coupled ultrasonic measurements are an established procedure, the use of air-coupled ultrasound provides the advantage of omitting the transducers’ coupling. As the coupling is a time-consuming task and imposes a certain variability between performed measurements, the adoption of air-coupled ultrasound would lead to a significant improvement of the evaluation method. Therefore, a comparison between both techniques using various mortar mixtures was performed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-0618 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133746 |