Development of machine learning methods to predict the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete and sensitivity analysis
•The CS of FRSCC was predicted using three ML models, namely XGBoost, DT, and Light GBM.•A database of 387 samples, 17 inputs, Monte Carlo and K-fold CV techniques were used for models development.•The XGBoost model has highest prediction and stability, followed by DT and Light GBM models.•Effect of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Construction & building materials 2023-02, Vol.367, p.130339, Article 130339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The CS of FRSCC was predicted using three ML models, namely XGBoost, DT, and Light GBM.•A database of 387 samples, 17 inputs, Monte Carlo and K-fold CV techniques were used for models development.•The XGBoost model has highest prediction and stability, followed by DT and Light GBM models.•Effect of 17 inputs on the output was evaluated by feature importance and Shap values.•Based on architectural analysis, XGB was proposed as the most accurate and reliable model.
Fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete (FRSCC), a great combination of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and fiber, plays a vital role as a potential construction material. Improving the accuracy of FRSCC’ performance prediction methods is critical and challenging to reduce costly experiments and time. Therefore, this study developed and assessed the performance of three machine learning models, including Decision tree, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), for predicting the compressive strength (CS) of FRSCC. The models were developed based on 387 data samples with 17 input parameters. Monte Carlo and K-fold cross-validation techniques were used to assess the models' generalizability and predictive performance. The results showed that the XGBoost model has the highest predictive performance and stability, with typical results R2 = 0.992, RMSE = 1.892 MPa, MAE = 1.438 MPa. The sensitivity analysis of the models indicated that cement, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, water, and sample age significantly influence the CS of FRSCC with inconsistent order. Finally, XGBoost was the most accurate and reliable model based on the final architecture analysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-0618 1879-0526 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130339 |