Vibration mitigation using dual-open and infilled trenches in layered soil media: Field tests and numerical simulations
Ground-borne vibrations are increasing at a rapid rate due to the rise in urban expansion and industrial activities. The current solution to mitigate the unwanted vibrations is limited to the use of single trenches that require unrealistic depths. This paper presents the possibilities of using dual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and geotechnics 2024-06, Vol.170, p.106283, Article 106283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ground-borne vibrations are increasing at a rapid rate due to the rise in urban expansion and industrial activities. The current solution to mitigate the unwanted vibrations is limited to the use of single trenches that require unrealistic depths. This paper presents the possibilities of using dual open and infilled trenches to mitigate the vibrations generated due to continuous harmonic motions. Full-scale field tests and comprehensive numerical studies were performed to systematically design dual trenches. The field vibration tests were performed under a wide range of frequencies using the Lazan-type mechanical oscillator. Similarly, numerical studies have been performed using finite element analysis software, PLAXIS 2D. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoams of different densities, bentonite, ceramsite, concrete, and sand-rubber mixture were used as the infill materials. The normalized depths of 0.40 and 0.50 were observed as the optimal values to reach an average amplitude reduction ratio (average ARR) of 0.25 for the dual open and EPS15-infilled trenches, respectively. The isolation efficiency of EPS15-infilled trenches was observed to be 178 % higher compared to the EPS48-infilled trenches. The performance difference between EPS15 and ceramsite-filled dual trenches was observed to be only 4 % in terms of average ARR, the former being superior. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-352X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106283 |