Counting wheat heads using a simulation model

•A simulation model that replicates the real conditions of a wheat field was proposed.•Four wheat head data sets (GWHD2021, SDAU2021, SDAU2022, SDAU2023) were collected as the test data.•Nine deep learning models, including Faster-RCNN, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, CenterNet, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, Deform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers and electronics in agriculture 2025-01, Vol.228, p.109633, Article 109633
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Xiaoyong, Jiang, Tianyou, Hu, Jiming, Song, Zuojie, Ge, Yuheng, Wang, Yongzhen, Liu, Xu, Bing, Jianhao, Li, Jinshan, Zhou, Ziyu, Tang, Zhongzhen, Zhao, Yan, Hao, Jinyu, Zuo, Changzhen, Geng, Xia, Kong, Lingrang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A simulation model that replicates the real conditions of a wheat field was proposed.•Four wheat head data sets (GWHD2021, SDAU2021, SDAU2022, SDAU2023) were collected as the test data.•Nine deep learning models, including Faster-RCNN, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, CenterNet, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, Deformable-DETR and DINO, were trained and tested.•The high counting accuracy demonstrated the efficacy of our simulation. Numerous studies have reported a significant positive correlation between wheat yield and the quantity of wheat heads. However, collecting data on wheat heads in the field poses a challenge for several reasons, including the uncontrollable nature of the environment, inconsistent data quality, and ambiguous data truth. To address these challenges, we developed a simulation strategy to replicate the conditions of a real wheat field, which enabled the data collection process to be conducted indoors over a short period. After applying grayscale image processing to process the simulated wheat images, we trained and tested nine deep learning models: Faster-RCNN, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, CenterNet, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, Deformable-DETR and DINO. Our results indicated that YOLOv7 performed the best (R2 = 0.963, RMSE = 2.463). We then compared our model trained on simulated wheat data to a model trained on real wheat data (R2 = 0.963 vs 0.972, RMSE = 2.463 vs 2.692). We also achieved good model performance on five test sets: GWHD, SDAU2021-SDAU2024. The results demonstrated the efficacy of our simulation, which provides an efficient and convenient strategy for the precision agriculture community.
ISSN:0168-1699
DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109633