Comparison of solid-phase extraction methods for efficient purification of phosphopeptides with low sample amounts

•Comparison of 16 different sorbents for SPE purification of phosphopeptides•Detailed investigation of performance parameters and selectivity of the methods•Up to 88% recovery can be achieved using appropriate SPE methods•30% of phosphopeptides are unique for each SPE method Efficient phosphoproteomic analysis of small amounts of biological samples (e.g. tissue biopsies) requires carefully selected enrichment and purification steps prior to the nanoflow HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is one of the most commonly used approaches for sample preparation. Several stationary phases are available for peptide SPE purification, however, most of the published methods are not optimized to provide good recoveries of phosphorylated peptides. Our goal was to investigate the performance of 13 self-packed and 3 commercial centrifugal SPE cartridges/spin tips, thus enhancing the efficiency of the phosphoproteomic analysis of small amounts of complex protein mixtures. Eight reversed-phase (RP), five graphite, two ion-exchange, and one hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) stationary phase were evaluated. Two RP, one graphite, and the HLB self-packed centrifugal SPE tips provided excellent results for the purification of 1 µg tissue and cell line digests. Using these methods, the sample loss was significantly reduced compared to one of the commercial SPE methods, 22-58% more unique phosphopeptides were identified, and the recovery was higher by 132-155%.