Boron isotopes of tourmalines from the central Himalaya: Implications for fluid activity and anatexis in the Himalayan orogen

The relationship between fluid activity and anatexis in the Himalaya is ambiguous in regard to whether it is dominated by fluid-saturated melting triggered by Lesser Himalayan Sequence (LHS) fluids or dehydration melting of Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) metasedimentary rocks. Boron isotopes are a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical geology 2022-05, Vol.596, p.120800, Article 120800
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Shuaiqi, Zhang, Guibin, Zhang, Lifei, Liu, Zeyu, Xu, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The relationship between fluid activity and anatexis in the Himalaya is ambiguous in regard to whether it is dominated by fluid-saturated melting triggered by Lesser Himalayan Sequence (LHS) fluids or dehydration melting of Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) metasedimentary rocks. Boron isotopes are a sensitive probe for tracing the source of fluids and their role during partial melting. However, a lack of constraints on LHS fluid activity has limited our understanding of anatectic processes in the Himalayan orogen. Here we report the results of in situ tourmaline and muscovite B isotope analyses of a suite of samples from the LHS and GHS, including chlorite schist from the LHS, quartz–tourmaline rock from the Main Central Thrust Zone, and leucogranites, leucosomes, mica schist, and garnet amphibolite from the GHS. Tourmaline B isotopic compositions fall in the range of δ11B = −18.3‰ to −8.2‰, with tourmalines from leucogranites showing δ11B values of −17.2‰ to −8.2‰, from leucosomes of −11.8‰ to −10.7‰, from schists of −17.8‰ to −13.9‰, from quartz–tourmaline rock of −18.3‰ to −12.8‰, and from garnet amphibolite of −16.9‰ to −13.6‰. Muscovites from leucogranite and mica schist yield relatively low B isotopes of −23.3‰ to −17.2‰ and −22.4‰ to −15.4‰, respectively. Different source compositions, prograde devolatilization, tourmaline fractionation, fluid exsolution, and external fluid metasomatism are inferred to be the main mechanisms responsible for the varied B isotopes in this study. Our data suggest that the LHS is characterized by depleted 11B, with LHS-derived dehydration fluids calculated to have δ11B values of −15.2‰ to −12.0‰ at 600 °C, whereas metamorphic fluids in the GHS have δ11B values of −11.8‰ to −4.8‰. Thus, we propose that dehydration of LHS hydrous minerals produced relatively light-B fluids. Consequently, leucogranites derived from hydration melting triggered by LHS fluids exhibit light B isotopic compositions compared with those derived from dehydration melting in the GHS. To investigate the source of heavy B in GHS leucogranites, we modeled B isotopic fractionation during muscovite prograde devolatilization, with results showing that substantial fractionation (∆11B > 7‰) would occur during muscovite dehydration. Hence, B lost from micas could be a source of heavy B in the leucogranites. On the basis of these results, we propose a model whereby LHS hydrous metasediments underwent intense dehydration, with the resultant fluids migrating up
ISSN:0009-2541
1872-6836
DOI:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.120800