Functionalized porphyrin as a carrier bridge and a passivator for perovskite solar cells
[Display omitted] •Two porphyrins of similar structure work differently as interfacial modifiers.•Synergistic mechanism involving passivation, dipole and hole transfer is proposed.•The m-DMeOTPP-treated PSC reaches a highest PCE of 24.56%.•Iodine ion migration is suppressed, thereby improving the de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2024-11, Vol.499, p.156504, Article 156504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Two porphyrins of similar structure work differently as interfacial modifiers.•Synergistic mechanism involving passivation, dipole and hole transfer is proposed.•The m-DMeOTPP-treated PSC reaches a highest PCE of 24.56%.•Iodine ion migration is suppressed, thereby improving the device stability.
Interfacial modification becomes one of the most emerging strategies in the state-of-the-art perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Here, two porphyrin derivatives (p-MeOTPP, m-DMeOTPP) with different methoxy groups are employed as the modifiers between perovskite and the hole transporting layer (HTL). The interaction at both of perovskite/modifier and modifier/HTL interfaces, and the hole-transfer ability of the modifier molecule are comprehensively studied, which are jointly responsible for the significant improvement in the optoelectronic properties of the device. More importantly, discussion on a molecular level reveals the distinct roles of modifiers with highly similar structures. A highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 24.56% is achieved for m-DMeOTPP modified PSCs, which is attributed to a synergy of efficient passivation effect at perovskite/modifier interface, sufficient built-in potential at modifier/HTL interface and minimal reorganization energy of hole hopping process. p-MeOTPP has a stronger passivation ability, but causes unfavorable interfacial dipole at modifier/HTL interface and a large energy barrier when hole’s hopping, only resulting in a smaller enhancement. Additionally, both modifers improve the device stability by strongly suppress the immigration of iodine species and moisture penetration. This work presents a synergy mechanism for interfacial engineering to pursue PSCs with high efficiency and stability, and provides practical guidelines at a molecular level to design a modifier not only as an efficient passivator but also as a high-speed carrier bridge. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1385-8947 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156504 |