High-performance ceramic coatings for additive manufacturing biofunctional titanium alloy by regulating precipitation orientation

•Ti-13Cu-1Al was obtained by SLM additive manufacturing technique.•AM-Ti-13Cu-1Al have lower work function and inferior corrosion resistance.•The Ti2Cu-(110) in AM-Ti-13Cu-1Al alloy have lower atomic close-packing degree.•The Cu ions released from Ti2Cu in AM alloy was prompted during the PEO.•AM-PE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2024-06, Vol.489, p.151325, Article 151325
Hauptverfasser: Mao, Yamei, Zhao, Qinyang, Geng, Jihua, Qian, Weifeng, Zou, Haiyan, Gong, Tao, Chen, Yongnan, Gao, Guangrui, Wang, Lin, Zhao, Yongqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Ti-13Cu-1Al was obtained by SLM additive manufacturing technique.•AM-Ti-13Cu-1Al have lower work function and inferior corrosion resistance.•The Ti2Cu-(110) in AM-Ti-13Cu-1Al alloy have lower atomic close-packing degree.•The Cu ions released from Ti2Cu in AM alloy was prompted during the PEO.•AM-PEO have very low COF (0.13) and excellent antibacterial rate (99.62%). To prepare high-performance plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings with excellent wear resistance and antibacterial activity on biofunctional alloys, Ti-Cu alloy was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM) technique with controlled crystalline orientation of precipitates to enhance Cu ions release during PEO. In contrast to ingot metallurgical (IM) Ti-Cu alloy with Ti2Cu-(103)-oriented, the Ti2Cu-(110)-oriented in AM-Ti-Cu alloy exhibits a lower work function and inferior corrosion resistance due to its low atomic close-packing. This facilitates the release of Cu ions by promoting valence electron escape from the 4 s energy level during PEO to promote forming a higher content copper oxide (CuO). Subsequent to the PEO treatment, the AM-PEO coating contains more CuO (44.44 wt%) compared to the IM-PEO coating (3.6 wt%), resulting in better corrosion resistance and a lower friction coefficient (0.13 for AM-PEO and 0.34 for IM-PEO). The antibacterial efficacy of AM-PEO coating reached 99.62 %. This study highlights the advantage of regulating precipitate phase orientation in AM processes as an innovative approach to efficiently fabricate functional PEO coatings for alloys.
ISSN:1385-8947
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.151325